This week’s readings were as interesting as they were
challenging. I really enjoyed Moreiras on the thriller genre as ethical. The
idea that a crime against another person is a suspension of ethics and that the
thriller is an ethical response is interesting. Today at lunch Moreiras spoke a
bit about the difference between radical evil and diabolical evil, in which
radical evil is self interested, and diabolical evil is to hurt another person-
which plays out in his discussion of the thriller as an ethical reaction, and
his idea that moralism protects autonomy and not heteronomy. I’m not positive
what he meant by every perspective through structural articulation is already
an ethical perspective- I think this relates to the extraliterary within the literary?
I was also interested in the way Moreiras writes about the ethical and the political.
In his articles, the ethical undoes or deconstructs? the political and vice
versa- the political undoes the ethical.
No comments:
Post a Comment